Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
707 F.3d 1081 (2013)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Rocio Henriquez-Rivas (plaintiff) was a citizen of El Salvador. When Henriquez-Rivas was a child, M-18 gang members entered her house and killed her father. Henriquez-Rivas and her sister were witnesses to the murder. Henriquez-Rivas identified the gang members in a lineup and testified against them in court, helping to convict them and send them to prison. Over the next few years, several men, including verified M-18 members, began asking about Henriquez-Rivas’s whereabouts and those of her sister. El Salvador had a witness-protection law to protect individuals who testified against violent criminals like M-18 members, but Henriquez-Rivas fled El Salvador for the United States, fearing that the M-18 members would harm her because of her testimony. After an asylum hearing, an immigration judge granted Henriquez-Rivas asylum in the United States, finding that under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), she was a member of a particular social group—people testifying against or opposing gang members—and that she had a well-founded fear of persecution based on her group status if she returned to El Salvador. The Board of Immigration Appeals (board) (defendant) reversed the judge’s decision, finding that Henriquez-Rivas’s group as defined by the judge lacked sufficient social visibility to constitute a particular social group under the INA. Henriquez-Rivas appealed to the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bea, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

