Her Majesty the Queen v. Morgentaler (Morgentaler III)

[1993] 3 S.C.R. 463 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Her Majesty the Queen v. Morgentaler (Morgentaler III)

Canada Supreme Court
[1993] 3 S.C.R. 463 (1993)

Facts

Dr. Henry Morgentaler (defendant) intended to open an abortion clinic in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia. In response, the local government of Nova Scotia passed the Medical Services Act (the act). The act provided that several medical procedures, including abortion, could only be performed in a hospital. The text of the act was identical in many areas to the federal criminal code outlawing abortion that the Canada Supreme Court had declared invalid several years earlier as violating the Canadian Charter’s guarantee to a woman of the security of her person, even though that criminal code had been a valid exercise of the federal legislature’s criminal powers. The act’s legislative history, furthermore, revealed that Nova Scotia’s objective in passing the law was to stop abortion in Nova Scotia as opposed to just regulating it. Dr. Morgentaler opened his clinic, and the province of Nova Scotia (plaintiff) charged him with violating the act. Dr. Morgentaler argued the act was unconstitutional as being outside the authority of the Nova Scotia legislature because the act fell within an area reserved for the exclusive criminal authority of the federal legislature. Nova Scotia argued that the act was a valid exercise of its power to regulate healthcare. The trial court agreed with Dr. Morgentaler and declared the act invalid. The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal upheld this ruling, and Nova Scotia sought review in the Canada Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sopinka, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership