Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management, Inc.

736 F.3d 1239 (9th Cir. 2013)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

736 F.3d 1239 (9th Cir. 2013)

Facts

Herb Reed was a founding member of “The Platters,” a world-famous singing group in the 1950s. The original band members assigned their rights in the name The Platters to Five Platters, Inc. (Five Platters). These trademark rights were transferred much later to Larry Marshak and Florida Entertainment Management, Inc. (Marshak) (defendants). After The Platters broke up in the 1960s, Reed continued performing under the name “The Platters.” In 1987, Five Platters sued Reed for trademark infringement, and the parties reached a settlement agreement that gave Reed the right to perform under the name “Herb Reed and the Platters.” Additionally, the settlement gave Reed the right to use the mark for The Platters if a final court order ever found that Five Platters did not have a right to The Platters mark. Reed formed Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC (Herb Reed Enterprises) (plaintiff) to manage his business affairs and hold his trademark rights. In 2012, Herb Reed Enterprises sued Five Platters for trademark infringement, alleging that “The Platters” was confusingly similar to “Herb Reed and The Platters.” Five Platters was defunct and did not respond, leading to a default judgment that gave Reed rights to The Platters mark. In 2012, Herb Reed Enterprises sued Marshak for trademark infringement and sought a preliminary injunction against Marshak’s use of The Platters mark. Marshak claimed that Herb Reed Enterprises had abandoned the mark, but Marshak did not provide any evidence to support this claim. The district court found that Herb Reed Enterprises was likely to succeed on the merits because it could assert a right to The Platters mark either through the 1987 settlement or the 2012 default judgment. However, even though Herb Reed Enterprises did not present evidence that it would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction was not issued, the district court also found a likelihood of irreparable harm and issued a preliminary injunction preventing Marshak from using The Platters mark. Marshak appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McKeown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership