Herbert v. Shanley Co.

242 U.S. 591 (1917)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Herbert v. Shanley Co.

United States Supreme Court
242 U.S. 591 (1917)

Facts

Two similar cases were consolidated and came before the United States Supreme Court. In each case, owners of copyrights on musical compositions (the copyright owners) (plaintiffs) filed an infringement suit against a hotel and restaurant (the businesses) (defendants). The copyright owners alleged that the hotel and restaurant had infringed the copyright owners’ exclusive right to perform publicly for profit by having orchestras perform the musical compositions in the dining room of the hotel and in the restaurant in violation of the Copyright Act of 1909. The businesses did not charge any admission fees for entrance, but customers paid for their meals, to which the performances served as entertainment. In the case of the hotel, the district court held that the performances were performances for profit in violation of the act. However, the court of appeals reversed. In the case of the restaurant, the district court held that the performances did not violate the act, and the court of appeals affirmed. The copyright owners appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership