Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Herbst v. Wuennenberg

Wisconsin Supreme Court
266 N.W.2d 391 (1978)


Facts

Jason Herbst, Ronald Nadel, and Robert Ritholz (plaintiffs) worked for the Republican party in Madison, Wisconsin, verifying that voters lived at the addresses listed on their voter registrations. The plaintiffs verified voter lists by visiting the addresses on the lists and checking the names printed on the mailboxes at those addresses. The plaintiffs entered an apartment building owned by Carol Wuennenberg (defendant), who served as a city alderperson for Madison. While the plaintiffs were checking the names on the mailboxes in the building’s vestibule, Wuennenberg came into the vestibule from inside the building. Wuennenberg inquired about the plaintiffs’ activities and became upset when they told her. The plaintiffs refused to identify themselves to Wuennenberg. Wuennenberg’s husband appeared, and at her request, he called the police. While she awaited the police, Wuennenberg exited the vestibule and stood outside the door in order to block the plaintiffs from leaving. The plaintiffs wanted to leave but remained in the vestibule. Five minutes later, the police arrived. After giving their names and purpose to the police, the police told the plaintiffs that they were doing nothing wrong. The plaintiffs brought a suit for false imprisonment against Wuennenberg. A jury found in the plaintiffs’ favor and awarded them damages. Wuennenberg appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Abrahamson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.