Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Herendeen v. Champion International Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
525 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1975)


Facts

James Herendeen (plaintiff) was a paper salesman for Nationwide Papers Incorporated (Nationwide) (defendant). On May 15, 1969, Herendeen resigned from his position in reliance on a promise from his employer that he would receive a new, written employment contract and continue to receive his benefits. When Herendeen did not receive a new contract, he brought suit in state court against U.S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc. (Champion) (defendant) and Nationwide, its subsidiary, alleging that the defendants had sought to defraud him of his benefits. Herendeen sought as damages $200,000 in lost commissions and $75,000 in lost pension benefits. The state court found that the complaint alleged an unenforceable, oral agreement to agree and, therefore, dismissed the case for Herendeen’s failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The state court did not reach the issue of damages. Herendeen later brought suit against Champion, Nationwide, and the trustees and administrators of his pension plan (defendants). Herendeen sought to receive payments he claimed he was entitled to under the regulations of his pension plan. The district court dismissed his claim on the ground of res judicata. Herendeen appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Waterman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.