Heritage Bank v. Lovett
Iowa Supreme Court
613 N.W.2d 652 (2000)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Richard Bennett was an employee of Culligan Water Conditioning (Culligan) (defendant), a company owned by Terry, Robert, and Roma Lovett (defendants). Bennett went to Donald and Luella Buell’s home to perform water-conditioning services on Culligan’s behalf. During the visit, Bennett stole an automated teller machine (ATM) card connected to the Buells’ bank account at Heritage Bank (Heritage) (plaintiff). Thereafter, Bennett used the ATM card to steal nearly $10,000 from the Buells’ bank account. Heritage reimbursed the Buells for the entire amount, except for $50. Heritage then brought suit against Culligan to recover the sum, arguing that Culligan was liable based on Culligan’s negligent hiring of Bennett, and that Heritage was entitled to bring suit because Heritage was subrogated to the Buells. Culligan moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted Culligan’s motion, finding that the loss of funds was suffered by Heritage directly, not the Buells, and that as a result, Heritage was not subrogated to the Buells. Heritage appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.