Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston
United States Supreme Court
459 U.S. 375 (1983)

- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
In 1969, Texas International Speedway, Inc. (TIS) filed a registration statement and prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission. TIS intended to offer securities valued at over $4 million for public sale in order to finance the construction of an automobile racetrack. The entire issue of securities was sold on its offering date in October 1969. A little over a year later, TIS filed for bankruptcy. Ralph Huddleston along with other investors (collectively, Huddleston) (plaintiffs) filed suit against most of the participants in the TIS offering, including Herman & MacLean (defendant), the accounting firm for the offering. Huddleston alleged that Hermann & MacLean and others had fraudulently misrepresented material facts regarding TIS, the company’s financial condition, and the costs of building a raceway. The district court found for Huddleston, determining that Herman & MacLean and others had violated § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 act) and SEC Rule 10b-5. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that an implied cause of action under SEC Rule 10b-5 could be maintained even if the fraudulent conduct was also prescribed by the express provisions of § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the 1993 act). Herman & MacLean appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

