Herman v. Markham Air Rifle Co.

258 F. 475 (1918)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Herman v. Markham Air Rifle Co.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
258 F. 475 (1918)

Facts

Markham Air Rifle Co. (Markham) (defendant) manufactured and distributed an air rifle called the King air rifle. Markham marketed the King air rifle to children as a harmless toy. Markham sold King air rifles to a wholesale dealer, knowing that the wholesale dealer would then sell them to other dealers and the rifles would eventually be sold in retail stores and purchased by individual customers. The King air rifles were loaded with shot, and Markham knew that the subsequent purchasers of the air rifles would not expect them to be loaded. Herman (plaintiff) worked in a retail store as a stockkeeper and salesperson. Herman showed a King air rifle to a customer, unaware that the King air rifle had come loaded with shot. The customer, also unaware that the King air rifle was loaded, pulled the trigger and shot Herman in the face. As a result, Herman lost her vision in her right eye and was likely to lose the vision in her left eye as well. Herman filed a negligence action against Markham, claiming that Markham was negligent in shipping loaded air rifles, that Markham failed to use reasonable care by permitting the air rifles to be loaded with shot and leaving the shot in them, and that Markham failed to properly inspect the air rifles to ensure they were not loaded before shipping them. Markham filed a demurrer, arguing that Herman did not allege actionable negligence and that the alleged negligence, even if actionable, was not the proximate cause of Herman’s injuries.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tuttle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership