This website requires JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari.

Options

From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Hermanson v. Hermanson

Nevada Supreme Court

110 Nev. 1400, 887 P.2d 1241 (1994) (1994)

Facts

Cindy Hermanson (plaintiff) and David Hermanson (defendant) were married in California. At the time of the wedding Cindy was six months pregnant. Cindy claimed that she told David that the child was conceived with another man, and David conceded that Cindy never told him that he was the father. The child, James Hermanson, was born in California several months after the wedding. Thereafter, Cindy and David lived in California for approximately three years with Cindy moving in and out of David’s home, otherwise seeking refuge in battered-women’s shelters or staying with friends. After three years, Cindy and David separated and Cindy moved to Iowa with James, where they lived for approximately five years. After five years, Cindy and David attempted to reconcile, and Cindy and James moved to Nevada. After approximately one month, Cindy filed for divorce. The trial court ruled that David was James’s father, applying California law, which at the time of James’s birth applied a conclusive presumption that a child born to a cohabiting husband and wife was issue of the marriage. Accordingly, the trial court entered a decree granting David joint legal custody and visitation rights. Cindy appealed, arguing that James’s paternity should be determined by Nevada law.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Unlock this case brief Read our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.
Learn about our approach Read more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
28,700 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
Uniform format for every case brief
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
Top-notch customer support