Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
H

Hermanson v. Hermanson

110 Nev. 1400, 887 P.2d 1241 (1994) (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hermanson v. Hermanson

Nevada Supreme Court
110 Nev. 1400, 887 P.2d 1241 (1994) (1994)

Facts

Cindy Hermanson (plaintiff) and David Hermanson (defendant) were married in California. At the time of the wedding Cindy was six months pregnant. Cindy claimed that she told David that the child was conceived with another man, and David conceded that Cindy never told him that he was the father. The child, James Hermanson, was born in California several months after the wedding. Thereafter, Cindy and David lived in California for approximately three years with Cindy moving in and out of David’s home, otherwise seeking refuge in battered-women’s shelters or staying with friends. After three years, Cindy and David separated and Cindy moved to Iowa with James, where they lived for approximately five years. After five years, Cindy and David attempted to reconcile, and Cindy and James moved to Nevada. After approximately one month, Cindy filed for divorce. The trial court ruled that David was James’s father, applying California law, which at the time of James’s birth applied a conclusive presumption that a child born to a cohabiting husband and wife was issue of the marriage. Accordingly, the trial court entered a decree granting David joint legal custody and visitation rights. Cindy appealed, arguing that James’s paternity should be determined by Nevada law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Conflict of Laws

Key Terms