Hermina Sague v. United States

416 F. Supp. 217 (1976)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hermina Sague v. United States

United States District Court, District of Puerto Rico
416 F. Supp. 217 (1976)

Facts

Berger, a French citizen, married Sague (collectively, plaintiffs), a U.S. citizen in France. Berger then filed an application for an immigrant visa with the United States Consular Officer in France. Berger’s application was denied under § 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Berger and Sague then filed an action in district court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 alleging that the denial of Berger’s visa deprived them of the rights, privileges, and immunities of the Constitution, and arguing that the statute upon which the Consular Officer relied was unconstitutional. Berger and Sague also sought an order directing that a visa be granted to Berger. The United States government (defendant) filed a motion to dismiss, alleging that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action, because judicial review of a consular officer’s decision to withhold a visa is not allowed by any law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership