From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...
Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc.
California Supreme Court
47 Cal. 4th 272, 97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 274, 211 P.3d 1063 (2009)
Hillsides, Inc. and Hillsides Children Center, Inc. (Hillsides) (defendants) operated a nonprofit home for neglected and abused children. Abigail Hernandez and Maria-Jose Lopez (plaintiffs) were employed at Hillsides as clerical staff. The plaintiffs shared an office, in which each plaintiff had her own computer workstation. The office door could be closed and locked, and the windows in the office had blinds. The plaintiffs sometimes used the office to change or adjust their clothing. One day, John Hitchcock (defendant) learned that an unknown person had used Lopez’s computer after working hours to access pornography. This was in violation of company policy and conflicted with Hillsides’s goal of providing a safe space for children. Hitchcock did not suspect the plaintiffs, because the conduct occurred after the plaintiffs had left for the day, and because several people had access to the plaintiffs’ office. Concerned that the children at the nonprofit home might be exposed to pornography, Hitchcock had a hidden camera installed in the plaintiffs’ office. Hitchcock was able to turn the camera on and off remotely and took care to keep the camera turned off during working hours. The plaintiffs were never captured on tape. The plaintiffs discovered the hidden camera and sued Hillsides, arguing that Hillsides had violated their right to privacy based on the tort of intrusion. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The appellate court reversed. The defendants appealed to the Supreme Court of California.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.