Hernandez v. New York
United States Supreme Court
500 U.S. 352 (1991)
A New York (defendant) court convicted Dionisio Hernandez (plaintiff) of attempted murder and possession of a weapon. During jury selection, the prosecutor used peremptory challenges to strike several Spanish speaking Latino jurors from the panel. Hernandez’s defense attorney objected to the peremptory strikes. The prosecutor then explained why he did not want those particular jurors on the panel. Some of the witnesses would be Spanish speaking, and an interpreter would translate their testimony. The prosecutor asked the Latino jurors if they would accept the interpreter’s translation of the testimony, and the jurors responded only that they would try. The prosecutor said he worried that the Spanish speaking jurors would unduly impact the other jurors. Hernandez appealed, arguing that the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges disproportionately impacted Latino jurors in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The case ultimately wound up before the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.