Supreme Court of Texas
2 S.W.3d 251 (1999)
Two-year-old Ruben Hernandez was severely burned when his older sister took a disposable butane lighter from the purse belonging to her mother, Gloria Hernandez (plaintiff), and started a fire. On Ruben’s behalf, Hernandez (plaintiff) filed a negligence and strict products liability suit in federal district court against the manufacturer of the lighter, Tokai Corporation (Tokai) (defendant), and the lighter’s distributor, Scripto-Tokai Corporation (defendant), claiming that the lighter was defectively designed and unreasonably dangerous because it did not have a child-resistant safety mechanism that would have prevented or reduced the likelihood that a child could use it to start a fire. Tokai conceded that such safety mechanisms were theoretically available when the lighter was designed and sold and that they could have been incorporated at nominal cost. Nevertheless, Tokai moved for summary judgment arguing that the company had no duty to incorporate the child-resistant features into a lighter’s design to protect unintended users, namely children, from the obvious and inherent dangers of butane lighters. Tokai further noted that warnings against access by children were provided with the lighters. Hernandez countered that because an alternative design existed at the time the lighters were sold it was for a jury to decide whether the lighter was defective under Texas’s common law risk-utility test. The district court granted Tokai’s motion for summary judgment. Hernandez appealed. The court of appeals certified a question to the Supreme Court of Texas: whether, under the state’s products liability statute a disposable butane lighter intended for adult use may be found to be defectively designed if it lacks a child-resistant mechanism.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.