Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Herzog Contracting Corporation v. McGowen Corporation

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
976 F.2d 1062 (1992)


Facts

Herzog Contracting Corporation (Herzog) (plaintiff) purchased the assets of a metal-hose corporation from McGowen Corporation (McGowen) (defendant) under an asset-purchase agreement. Herzog assigned the asset-purchase agreement to Tru-Flex, Herzog’s subsidiary. The agreement required annual payments of $500,000 from Tru-Flex to McGowen. Herzog paid $400,000 to McGowen, and McGowen executed two promissory notes in favor of Tru-Flex that totaled $400,000. Herzog claimed that Herzog had loaned McGowen the $400,000 and that the notes were McGowen’s promise to repay the loan. McGowen claimed that the $400,000 was a partial prepayment under the asset-purchase agreement and that the purpose of the notes was to allow McGowen to postpone the realization of taxable income on the $400,000 to the following year by making the payment look like a loan. Herzog failed to pay under the asset-purchase agreement. Tru-Flex assigned the promissory notes to Herzog, and Herzog sued McGowen to enforce the notes. Herzog conceded to not being a holder in due course of the notes. The district court refused to admit parol evidence as to the intent of the notes, holding that the notes were clear and unambiguous and therefore enforceable, even if the parties never intended for the notes to be presented for payment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Herzog. McGowen appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.