Herzog v. Irace
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
594 A.2d 1106 (1991)
- Written by Christine Hilgeman, JD
Facts
Gary G. Jones was injured in a motorcycle accident and engaged Anthony Irace and Donald Lowry (Irace) (defendants) to represent him in filing a personal injury claim in connection with this accident. While the claim was pending, Jones received medical treatment from Dr. John P. Herzog (plaintiff) for an unrelated injury. As he was unable to pay for the medical treatment, he signed a letter on June 14 stating that Dr. Herzog should be paid for his services from the settlement proceeds. Irace was informed by Herzog that Jones had assigned the proceeds of his settlement to Herzog to the extent necessary to pay for the medical services rendered. After receiving confirmation from Irace’s office that medical care rendered by Herzog to Jones could be paid from the settlement proceeds, Herzog proceeded to treat Jones, including performing surgery. Irace ultimately obtained a $20,000 settlement for Jones and Jones instructed Irace not to disburse funds to Herzog, claiming he would make the payment. Irace informed Herzog that Jones had withdrawn his permission to disburse funds to Herzog and proceeded to distribute the settlement funds to Jones and his other creditors. Herzog sued Irace in district court claiming that the assignment was enforceable against Irace. Irace defended that Jones had not relinquished all control, so the assignment was not effective, and enforcement would interfere with their ethical obligations to Jones. The district court found in favor of Herzog. Irace appealed to the Superior Court of Maine as an intermediate appellate court, which also found in favor of Herzog. Irace then appealed to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brody, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.