Hewlett-Packard Company, Inc. v. Helge Berg

61 F.3d 101 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hewlett-Packard Company, Inc. v. Helge Berg

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
61 F.3d 101 (1995)

Facts

In 1982 Apollo Computer (Apollo), later acquired by Hewlett-Packard (plaintiff), entered into a two-year distributorship contract with a Swedish company called Dicoscan Distributed Computer Scandinavia (Dicoscan) to sell Hewlett-Packard products. In March 1984, the parties executed a new distributorship contract. Both agreements contained an arbitration clause. Apollo terminated the 1984 contract, and Dicoscan filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court named the directors and officers of Dicoscan—Helge Berg and Lars Skoog (defendants)—the parties entitled to pursue claims against Apollo based on the contracts. Berg and Skoog commenced arbitration proceedings against Apollo, claiming damages from Apollo’s unilateral termination of the 1984 agreement. Apollo counterclaimed by asserting that Dicoscan was liable for several hundreds of thousands of dollars due under the 1982 contract. The panel issued an award to Berg and Skoog, and the panel held that it was without jurisdiction to decide Apollo’s claim based on the 1982 contract. Apollo paid the award minus a setoff based on the amounts it claimed were due from Dicoscan under the 1982 contract. Apollo also filed a request with the tribunal for a second arbitration regarding the 1982 contract. Apollo’s successor, Hewlett-Packard, also filed an action in district court seeking a declaration that Hewlett-Packard was entitled to the setoff and that the arbitration award was fully satisfied. Berg and Skoog sought confirmation of the full amount of the arbitration award. Hewlett-Packard asked the court to stay the confirmation proceedings until the arbitration on the 1982 contract was completed. The district court denied Hewlett-Packard’s requested relief on the ground that it lacked authority to stay the confirmation proceedings and confirmed the full amount of the award to Berg and Skoog. Hewlett-Packard appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boudin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership