Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Hickman v. Taylor

United States Supreme Court
329 U.S. 495 (1947)

Hickman v. Taylor

Facts

On February 7, 1943, the tugboat "J.M. Taylor" (defendant) sank while helping to tow a car float belonging to the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad. Five crew members died in the accident. J.M. Taylor’s owners and underwriters of the company hired attorneys to prepare defenses against potential suits of the deceased and to seek damages against Baltimore & Ohio Railroad. Fortenbaugh, one of the hired attorneys, privately interviewed four survivors of the accident after each had testified in a public hearing about the incident. Fortenbaugh interviewed other witnesses and memorialized his findings. Of the five estates of the deceased, only one estate, Hickman (plaintiff), filed suit in federal court against the tugboat owners and the railroad company under the Jones Act. In preparing a defense, opposing counsel asked for exact copies of all written statements and summaries of all information taken orally. Fortenbaugh declined on the basis of privilege taken in the course of preparing for litigation. The district court ordered him to comply. Taylor appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Jackson, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.