Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Higday v. Nickolaus

Kansas City Court of Appeals, Missouri
469 S.W.2d 859 (1971)


Facts

Several landowners (plaintiffs) owned farmland overlying a water basin. The basin supplied water for the landowners’ agricultural and personal uses. The City of Columbia (the city) (defendant) had a water shortage. The city acquired land overlying the water basin, for the purpose of extracting and transporting 11.5 million gallons of water daily for sale to the city’s residents. The basin’s daily recharge rate was 10.5 million gallons. The landowners sued the city seeking: (1) a judicial declaration that the city had no right to extract the water for any use unrelated to the beneficial ownership or enjoyment of the land, including sale away from the land, and (2) an injunction preventing the city from extracting the water. The landowners claimed that the city’s intended consumption would lower the basin’s water table and harm the landowners’ ability to use the groundwater. However, the city claimed that the English common law rule of absolute ownership of percolating waters gave it the right to withdraw an unlimited amount of groundwater, even if the result was to drain all groundwater from neighboring lands. The city moved to dismiss the case, and the trial court granted the motion. The landowners appealed to the Kansas City Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Shangler, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.