Higgins v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 293 (2006)
Charles Higgins, 21, became guardian for his minor siblings (plaintiffs) after their parents died, and the family moved in with the Leomatis. The Higginses were chosen to participate in the television program, Extreme Makeover, in which the Leomitis’ home would be renovated. The Higgins and the Leomitis each received a 24-page agreement. The agreement advised the reader not to sign until reading it completely. A miscellaneous section contained an arbitration clause. No special font was used to draw attention to the clause. The clause required only the Higginses to submit to arbitration, barred them from appealing an arbitration decision, and required the parties to split the arbitration costs. Charles Higgins quickly signed the documents. The Leomitis home was reconstructed, and their mortgage was paid off. After the show was broadcast, the Leomitis kicked the Higgins out. The Higgins sued the networks, producers, construction crew, and the Leomitis (defendants) under various theories. The defendants petitioned the court to compel arbitration, which was granted for most of the claims. The Higginses petitioned for a writ of mandate from the California Court of Appeal, arguing that the arbitration clause was unconscionable.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rubin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 707,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.