Hildebrand v. Franklin Life Insurance Co.

455 N.E.2d 553 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hildebrand v. Franklin Life Insurance Co.

Illinois Appellate Court
455 N.E.2d 553 (1983)

RW

Facts

Stephen Hildebrand applied for and paid the premium to obtain a life-insurance policy from Franklin Life Insurance Company (Franklin) (defendant). Franklin gave Stephen a conditional receipt, which stated that coverage would be retroactive to the date of application, provided that a subsequent check by Franklin’s underwriters showed that Stephen met all of Franklin’s conditions for insurability. Stephen was killed while Franklin’s determination was still pending. After learning of Stephen’s death, the company launched a special inquiry, which found that Stephen’s application concealed a dismal driving record, which made him a poor insurance risk. Franklin rejected Stephen’s application. Stephen’s mother and beneficiary, Judith Ann Hildebrand (Judith) (plaintiff), sued Franklin. The trial judge instructed the jury that Franklin had to prove that its underwriting policies conformed to an ordinarily prudent person’s reasonable expectations and that it processed Stephen’s application promptly and according to its regular procedures. The jury returned its verdict for Judith, and Franklin appealed to the Illinois Appellate Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership