Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto
Canada Supreme Court
[1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130, 126 D.L.R. (4th) 129 (1995)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
Morris Manning (defendant), a member of the Church of Scientology of Toronto (the church) (defendant), held an outdoor press conference in Toronto during which he discussed allegations against Crown attorney Casey Hill (plaintiff). The allegations came from a notice of motion that the church intended to use to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Hill. The notice claimed that Hill had misled a judge and had violated orders sealing documents belonging to the church. The allegations were found to be false and unfounded at the contempt proceeding. Hill filed a libel action for damages against Manning and the church. At trial, Manning and the church were found jointly liable for 300,000 Canadian dollars in general damages, and the church was separately found liable for 500,000 Canadian dollars in aggravated damages and 800,000 Canadian dollars in punitive damages.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cory, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
