Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hill v. Jones

Arizona Court of Appeals
725 P.2d 1115 (1986)


Facts

In 1982, Warren and Gloria Hill (buyers) (plaintiffs) entered into an agreement to purchase the residence of Ora and Barbara Jones (sellers) (defendants). The purchase agreement required sellers to pay for and place in escrow a termite inspection report stating that the property did not have a termite infestation. Before executing the purchase agreement, buyers visited the residence on multiple occasions. During one visit, buyers noticed a small “ripple” in the wood floor that they believed could be termite damage, but were assured by sellers it was water damage. When completed, the termite inspection report said that no visible evidence of termite infestation existed, and the realtor informed buyers that the property passed termite inspection. Buyers executed the purchase agreement and moved into the residence. After moving in, however, buyers learned that sellers had actually experienced termite infestation on several prior occasions, and had paid for several termite infestation treatments. A neighbor also pointed out several examples of termite damage throughout the residence and the surrounding fence. Finally, on a second inspection, a termite inspector confirmed evidence of termite infestation. Sellers did not share any of this information with buyers, the realtor, or the termite inspector. Buyers brought suit alleging that sellers made misrepresentations and failed to disclose material facts to them about termite damage. The trial court granted summary judgment for sellers, and both parties appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Meyerson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.