Hill v. Stone
United States Supreme Court
421 U.S. 289 (1975)
Texas law authorized a municipal bond election procedure that distinguished between voters registering property for taxation and voters not registering property. The law provided that a bond issue would pass only in the event that that it was approved by both a majority of participants casting votes as registrants of property and the combined majority of all voters. The city of Fort Worth (defendant) held a bond election for the purpose of authorizing debt to construct a public library. The bond issuance was approved by the combined majority of voters, but did not receive approval from the majority of participants voting as registrants of property. Because the proposed bond issuance did not receive majority approval from both categories of voters, the city regarded the election results as a denial of authority for bond issuance. A group of individuals voting as non-registrants (plaintiffs) filed suit in the federal district court asserting that the bond election procedure afforded an unconstitutional preference to registrants of taxable property in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court ruled in favor of the non-registrants. City officials petitioned the Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 148,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.