Hinman v. Pacific Air Transport
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
84 F.2d 755 (1936)
Pacific Air Transport and United Air Lines Transport Corporation (airlines) (defendants) operated airplanes that regularly flew over property owned by Hinman (plaintiff). Hinman brought suit against each airline for trespass, alleging that he had title to the airspace above his property of a height ranging from at least 150 feet to an indefinite distance, and that the airplanes had flown less than 100 feet above his property. Hinman sought an injunction preventing the airplanes from flying over his property, in addition to $90,000 in damages from each airline. The district court sustained each airline’s motion to dismiss. Hinman appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Haney, J.)
Dissent (Mathews, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.