Hirsch v. Silberstein
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
227 A.2d 638 (1967)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Hirsch (plaintiff) entered into a contract to sell a one-acre lot neighboring his property to Silberstein (defendant). Prior to entering the agreement, Hirsch had investigated Silberstein’s place of work and obtained a credit report on him, determining he “would make a desirable neighbor.” Silberstein, acting as the agent of the Cross family, purchased the lot and immediately conveyed the land to the Crosses. The Crosses were a Black family. Hirsch filed suit to rescind the contract. Hirsch claimed that he would not have agreed to sell to Silberstein had he known the identity of the true purchasers. The lower court dismissed Hirsch’s complaint. Hirsch appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cohen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


