From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
HMO-W Inc. v. SSM Health Care System
Wisconsin Supreme Court
611 N.W. 2d 250 (2000)
In 1983, SSM Health Care System (SSM) (defendant), together with other healthcare providers, formed HMO-W Inc. (HMO-W) (plaintiff), a closely held corporation with only minority shareholders. HMO-W proposed a merger with United Wisconsin Services (United) and retained Valuation Research Corporation (VR) to value HMO-W’s assets prior to and upon the potential merger. HMO-W accepted VR’s valuation report, which estimated HMO-W’s net value at between $16,500,000 and $18,000,000. HMO-W’s board voted to approve the merger with United. The VR report and proxy materials were sent to the shareholders. At the shareholder meeting, SSM and another shareholder, Neillsville Clinic (Neillsville), voted against the proposed merger. The merger was still approved. SSM and Neillsville demanded payment for their dissenting shares, and HMO-W hired a new appraiser, which valued HMO-W’s assets at $7,400,000. Based on the second valuation, HMO-W sent SSM a check for approximately $1,500,000. SSM disputed the valuation based on unfair dealing, claiming that the fair value of SSM’s shares totaled $4,700,000. HMO-W instituted appraisal proceedings to determine the value of the dissenting shares. At trial, HMO-W and SSM presented experts with differing valuations, but the trial court accepted the valuation offered by HMO-W’s expert. The trial court then applied a 30 percent minority discount to the value of the dissenting shares and ordered SSM and Neillsville to repay with interest the excess amount of HMO-W’s initial payment. SSM appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s valuation in part, but reversed and remanded for a fair-value determination without the minority discount. The state supreme court granted review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bradley, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.