Logourl black

Hoctor v. United States Department of Agriculture

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
82 F.3d 165 (7th Cir. 1996)


The Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (Act) was designed to assure the humane treatment of animals. The Act authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to promulgate rules and regulations as necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Act. The Act specifically requires the Department of Agriculture to formulate standards for the handling, care, treatment and transportation of animals. 7 U.S.C. § 2143(a). Pursuant to the Act, the Department of Agriculture employed the notice and comment procedure to promulgate a regulation, entitled “structural strength”, that provides that the “facility [housing the animals] must be of such material and of such strength as appropriate for the animals involved. The indoor and outdoor housing facilities shall be structurally sound and shall be maintained in good repair to protect the animals from injury and to contain the animals.” 9 C.F.R. § 3.125(a). Patrick Hoctor (plaintiff) was a dealing in big cats, including lions, tigers, cougars, and leopards. In 1982, Hoctor housed these animals in an enclosure with a six-foot perimeter fence. The next year, the Department issued an internal memorandum to its inspectors requiring perimeter fences for big cats be eight feet high pursuant to the “structural strength” rule. Hoctor was cited for his violation of this rule. Hoctor brought suit challenging the validity of the eight-foot rule.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 92,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,498 briefs - keyed to 168 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now