Hodge Brothers v. DeLong Co.

942 F. Supp. 412 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hodge Brothers v. DeLong Co.

United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
942 F. Supp. 412 (1996)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Hodge Brothers, Inc. (Hodge) (plaintiff) owned a grain and soybean farm, and DeLong Company, Inc. (DeLong) (defendant) was a grain dealer in Wisconsin. Hodge and DeLong entered into several agreements for grain purchasing. Each agreement contained a provision stating that the contract was made in accordance with the applicable trade rules of the National Grain and Feed Association (association). Hodge was not a member of the association. The trade rules were listed in a separate booklet and stated that disputes between members of the association would be resolved through the association’s arbitration committee. The arbitration committee would then use the association’s specific arbitration rules. The arbitration rules were listed in a third separate document and stated that if a nonmember agreed to dispute resolution by the association, the nonmember agreed to be bound by the arbitration rules. A dispute arose between the two companies, and Hodge filed suit against DeLong in federal district court on federal and state grounds. DeLong counterclaimed but also filed a motion to stay the proceedings and compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). DeLong cited the grain-purchasing agreements, claiming that they incorporated the association’s mandatory arbitration provision by reference. Hodge claimed that it was not bound by the provision because the incorporated trade rules applied only to association members. Additionally, Hodge argued that, even if it were bound to the trade rules of the association, it was not bound to the separate arbitration rules mentioned because the arbitration rules were not expressly incorporated into the purchase agreements.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Crabb, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership