Hoffman Estates, Inc. v. The Flipside
United States Supreme Court
455 U.S. 489 (1982)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
The Village of Hoffman Estates (the village) (defendant) enacted a municipal ordinance requiring a business to obtain a license if it sold any items that were designed or marketed for use with illegal cannabis or drugs. The ordinance applied to items containing drug-related logos, designs, or slogans. The ordinance also treated the proximity of drug-related literature as an indicator that an item was marketed for use with cannabis or drugs. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. (The Flipside) operated a shop in the village in which it sold records, jewelry, novelty devices, and smoking accessories. After the ordinance was enacted, the village attorney advised The Flipside’s owner to remove a number of items in one section of the store to avoid the licensing requirement. The Flipside sued the village in federal district court, arguing that the ordinance was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. The district court found that the ordinance was constitutional. The court of appeals reversed, finding that the ordinance was unconstitutionally vague on its face. The Flipside appealed, and the United States Supreme Court noted that it had jurisdiction over the matter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.