Hojnowski v. Vans Skate Park

901 A.2d 381 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hojnowski v. Vans Skate Park

New Jersey Supreme Court
901 A.2d 381 (2006)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Play video

Facts

Twelve-year-old Andrew Hojnowski (plaintiff) went with his mother to a skate park operated by Vans (defendant), a skateboard retailer. Before Hojnowski was permitted to enter the skate park, Vans required his mother to sign a release. The release contained a requirement to arbitrate any claims of injury and a waiver of the right to seek damages if injured by Vans’s negligence. Hojnowski fractured his femur at the skate park when another skateboarder aggressively forced Hojnowski off a ramp. Prior to the accident, Hojnowski’s parents had complained to Vans about the aggressive skateboarder. Hojnowski sued Vans for negligence in its failure to supervise the skate park and its participants. In response, Vans filed a demand for arbitration. Hojnowski filed a motion to invalidate the pre-injury release that Hojnowski’s mother had signed, while Vans cross-moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted Vans’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing Hojnowski’s complaint and ordering arbitration. The trial court declined to rule on Hojnowski’s motion to invalidate the pre-injury release, leaving that issue to be determined in arbitration. Hojnowski appealed. The appeals court affirmed the validity of the arbitration clause but held that the pre-injury release was invalid. Hojnowski appealed the affirmation of the arbitration clause, and Vans appealed the invalidation of the pre-injury release.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Zazzali, J.)

Dissent (LaVecchia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership