Holcombe v. Whitaker
Alabama Supreme Court
294 Ala. 430 (1975)
- Written by Kate Luck, JD
Facts
Joan Whitaker (plaintiff) had begun dating M. C. Holcombe, Jr. (defendant) believing he was divorced from his ex-wife. Whitaker and Holcombe eventually married. A month later, Holcombe began dating his ex-girlfriend. When Whitaker voiced her objection to Holcombe’s relationship, Holcombe informed Whitaker that he was still married to his ex-wife. Whitaker asked Holcombe to annul Whitaker and Holcombe’s marriage or to divorce his ex-wife and make Whitaker and Holcombe’s marriage legal. Holcombe and Whitaker’s relationship deteriorated, and Whitaker continued to ask Holcombe for an annulment. Whitaker contended that during one conversation in which she requested an annulment, Holcombe stated that he would kill Whitaker if she took him to court. Whitaker alleged that she began receiving harassing phone calls from Holcombe. Whitaker filed suit against Holcombe for assault, among other claims. After Whitaker filed the suit, Holcombe came to her apartment, banged on her door, tried to open the door, and again threatened to kill Whitaker if she sued him. Upon the verdict of the jury, the trial court entered judgment for Whitaker. Holcombe appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shores, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.