Holiday Inns, Inc. v. 800 Reservation, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for Sixth Circuit
86 F.3d 619 (1996)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Holiday Inns, Inc. (plaintiff) was a corporation that owned and operated more than 1000 hotels under the registered trademark “Holiday Inn.” Holiday Inns spent tens of millions of dollars every year on advertising, including advertising its reservation phone number, 1-800-HOLIDAY. Holiday Inns had not registered the phone number itself as a trademark. Call Management Systems (defendant) was a consulting company that assisted businesses in processing their toll-free number systems. Although many businesses frequently obtained toll-free numbers that were likely to be confused with their actual number, Holiday Inns had failed to obtain the complementary number 1-800-H[zero]LIDAY. Call Management acquired that number and contracted with 800 Reservation, Inc. (defendant) a hotel reservations clearinghouse, to operate the number as a reservation line for multiple hotel chains, including Holiday Inns. Holiday Inns sued Call Management and 800 Reservation for trademark infringement and unfair competition. The district court granted Holiday Inns partial summary judgement and a permanent injunction against 800 Reservation and Call Management from using the 1-800-H[zero]LIDAY number.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Daughtrey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.