Holland v. Lampen-Wolfe
United Kingdom House of Lords
1 WLR 1573 (2000)

- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
Lampen-Wolfe (defendant) was an official with the United States Department of Defense at a base in the United Kingdom. The base was a signals intelligence site that supported the United States as well as the United Kingdom and the North American Treaty Organization. Lampen-Wolfe was an educational-services officer, a role that included providing training and educational programs to others on the base. Part of this program entailed courses for base personnel to receive master’s degrees in international relations from an American university. In his capacity as an educator, Lampen-Wolfe wrote a memorandum that included statements concerning Holland (plaintiff), who was a professor at the same American university that provided the international-relations program. The statements noted performance issues that Holland’s students had allegedly raised and requested that another instructor take over Holland’s classes. Holland sued Lampen-Wolfe for defamation, claiming the statements were untrue and harmed her reputation. She sought damages. The United States asserted immunity on behalf of Lampen-Wolfe. The trial court agreed and dismissed the case. Holland appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.