Hollomon v. Keadle

931 S.W.2d 413 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hollomon v. Keadle

Arkansas Supreme Court
931 S.W.2d 413 (1996)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD
Play video

Facts

Mary Hollomon (plaintiff) was employed by Dr. W. R. Keadle (defendant) for a little over two years. Hollomon left voluntarily, claiming she resigned because of Keadle’s cursing. On her second day, Hollomon understood Keadle to be a grouch who constantly cursed and yelled. Over the course of Hollomon’s employment, Keadle repeatedly cursed at and insulted Hollomon. According to Hollomon, she remained with Keadle’s office because she was a poor, single parent. Hollomon alleged that Keadle routinely made degrading remarks about women and aimed profanity at Hollomon in front of patients and coworkers. Hollomon also alleged that Keadle made veiled threats of physical harm. Hollomon claimed that Keadle’s conduct caused her a host of health problems, both physical and mental, including stomach pain and anxiety attacks. She reported her issues with Keadle to a counselor but did not seek counseling services. Keadle and another doctor gave Hollomon medication for her stomach problems, but there was no indication that Keadle knew the stomach problems were related to his use of profanity. Hollomon filed an action for the tort of outrage (also known as intentional infliction of emotional distress) in the trial court. The trial court dismissed Hollomon’s claim because the allegations were insufficient to support a claim for the tort of outrage. Hollomon appealed to the Arkansas Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roaf, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership