Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Holloway v. Arkansas

United States Supreme Court
435 U.S. 475 (1978)


Facts

Attorney Harold Hall was appointed to represent three defendants charged in the same criminal activity. Prior to trial, Hall recognized that conflicting information he had received from each defendant might present a conflict of interest if the defendants decided to testify at trial. Prior to trial, Hall moved twice to have separate counsel appointed for each defendant. The trial court denied his motions. At trial, Hall advised the court that each defendant wanted to testify and that conflicts of interest would probably arise during the course of their testimony. The trial court concluded that each defendant understood the consequences of testifying on his own behalf and allowed them to take the stand. Holloway (defendant) took the stand and Hall advised him that he could not pursue any direct examination because it might tend to incriminate Holloway or one of his co-defendants. Hall testified that he had expected to be questioned while on the witness stand. Hall presented unguided testimony during which he denied involvement in the crime. Hall’s two codefendants presented similarly unguided testimony and both denied any involvement in the crime. All three defendants were convicted by the jury. All three defendants appealed their convictions through the state courts on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. The state supreme court upheld the convictions. Holloway and his co-defendants petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Powell, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.