Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
North Carolina Court of Appeals
428 S.E.2d 453 (1993)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Jean Dawson (defendant), an employee of Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. (Wachovia) (defendant), was attempting to repossess a car financed by Wachovia and owned by Hallie Holloway (plaintiff). When Dawson attempted to repossess the car, Hallie was present along with Hallie’s mother, Sue Holloway (plaintiff), Hallie’s 10-year-old niece, Swanzett Holloway (plaintiff), and Hallie’s infant son, Damien Holloway (plaintiff). In attempting to repossess the car, Dawson reached into the vehicle through the window and elbowed Damien, who was lying on Hallie’s chest, while trying to wrench the keys from Hallie, who was sitting in the driver’s seat with the keys in the ignition. Damien, who was four months old, was asleep through much of the encounter. Dawson also pointed a gun at Hallie and Damien. Swanzett witnessed all this from the back seat. Despite Dawson’s efforts, Hallie drove away. All four Holloways filed an action against Wachovia and Dawson for assault, and Hallie and Damien filed claims for battery. Hallie and Sue’s claims were dismissed due to the statute of limitations, but the case went to trial on Damien and Swanzett’s claims. During trial, Swanzett testified that she saw the gun and the barrel of the gun, which was black and brown, that Dawson was pointing the gun at Hallie and Damien, and that she was afraid that Dawson would shoot her. The court issued directed verdicts against Damien and Swanzett on all of their claims, and they appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Eagles, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.