Holmdel Builders Association v. Township of Holmdel

583 A.2d 277 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Holmdel Builders Association v. Township of Holmdel

New Jersey Supreme Court
583 A.2d 277 (1990)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

In 1975, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Mount Laurel Township, 336 A.2d 713 (N.J. 1975) (Mt. Laurel I) held that developing municipalities are constitutionally required to provide necessary and realistic opportunities to develop low- and moderate-income housing and in 1983 reaffirmed the constitutional mandate by imposing an affirmative obligation on every municipality to provide adequate affordable housing in Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Mount Laurel Township, 456 A.2d 390 (N.J. 1983) (Mt. Laurel II). The legislature codified the Mt. Laurel doctrine in the enactment of the Fair Housing Act (FHA). Several municipalities (defendants) attempted to comply with their constitutional obligation to provide a realistic opportunity for the construction of affordable housing by enacting ordinances that imposed fees on developers as a condition for new-development approval. The fees were dedicated to an affordable-housing trust fund. Developers from the municipalities (plaintiffs) brought suit in district court against the municipal governments and argued that the municipal governments did not have statutory authority to impose development fees. The district court found in favor of the municipalities, and the developers appealed. The appellate court found that the municipalities had the authority to impose affordable-housing development fees.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Handler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership