Holtz’s Estate v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
38 T.C. 37 (1962)
- Written by Christine Raino, JD
Facts
On June 12, 1953, Leon Holtz created a trust and funded it with property valued at $384,117. Under the terms of the trust, Leon would receive the income for life and as much principal as the sole trustee, a bank, decided was appropriate for Leon’s “welfare, comfort and support,” or for “hospitalization or other emergency needs.” If Leon’s wife survived him, she would receive the trust income for life and principal as needed under the same terms. The trust would terminate upon the surviving spouse’s death. In 1955, Leon transferred an additional $50,000 to the trust. Leon did not reserve the right to amend or revoke the trust, either in himself or another person. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (defendant) determined that Leon’s transfers to the trust in 1953 and 1955 were taxable gift transfers and computed tax based on the actuarial value of Leon’s life estate in the trust. Leon’s estate commenced an action in the United States Tax Court. At a hearing, evidence of a conversation between Leon and a trust officer at the trustee bank demonstrated that Leon had been concerned about having access to all of the trust assets if necessary and that the trust officer agreed to be “liberal” in paying principal out of the trust. Leon’s estate (plaintiff) asserted that the transfers were not taxable because they were not completed gifts.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Drennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.