Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Holtzman v. Schlesinger

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
484 F.2d 1307 (1973)


Facts

After United States ground forces had been removed from Cambodia in 1970, the U.S. continued to provide air support. Attempts to end the fighting were unsuccessful, and three years later, U.S. forces proceeded to bomb Cambodian Communist groups there. In May of 1975, Congress passed a bill disapproving the bombings by cutting off all funds that had been supporting U.S. initiatives in Cambodia. On June 27, President Nixon vetoed the bill, believing it would chill the possibility of a settlement in the country. The House did not override the president’s veto, and two days later, Congress and the president signed an agreement allowing U.S. involvement in Cambodia to continue only until August 15, 1973, after which time all activities would cease. The matter came before a federal district court, which issued a judgment that there was no congressional authority for the president to order American military forces in combat or to release bombs in Cambodia. The district court further held that these actions by members of the American armed forces (defendants) were unauthorized and consequently unlawful. The order further enjoined the defendants and their officers from participating in any way in military activities in Cambodia. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Mulligan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Oakes, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.