From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Holzbach v. United Virginia Bank
Virginia Supreme Court
219 S.E.2d 868, 216 Va. 482 (1975)
Facts
Arthur Hall’s will established a marital trust for his wife, Julia Hall, taking advantage of the federal marital estate-tax deduction. The trust paid Julia the income for life and gave her a testamentary power of appointment over the corpus. Arthur’s will specifically gave Julia a general power of appointment “by specific reference to the powers granted herein, in her will,” to direct distribution to her estate or any other party. If Julia failed to exercise the power of appointment, then the corpus would go to a residual trust under Arthur’s will. Arthur’s will appointed United Virginia Bank (plaintiff) executor of Arthur’s estate and trustee of Julia’s marital trust. Julia’s will gave her sister, Hazel Holzbach (defendant), “all of my estate, be it real, personal, or mixed, or in which I may have a power of appointment of whatsoever, nature, kind or description, and wheresoever the same may be located.” The bank petitioned the court to decide whether Julia’s will effectively exercised her power of appointment, naming Holzbach as a party in interest. The person who wrote Julia’s will submitted an affidavit stating that Julia knew she had a power of appointment under Arthur’s will and discussed it with the drafter when her will was prepared. The judge nonetheless found that Julia’s will did not exercise her power of appointment and ordered the corpus of the marital trust distributed as part of Arthur’s residuary estate. Holzbach appealed, arguing Julia intended to and did appoint the corpus to Holzbach.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Poff, J.)
Dissent (Harrison and Cochran, JJ.)
What to do next…
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.