Holzbach v. United Virginia Bank

219 S.E.2d 868, 216 Va. 482 (1975)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...

Holzbach v. United Virginia Bank

Virginia Supreme Court

219 S.E.2d 868, 216 Va. 482 (1975)

Facts

Arthur Hall’s will established a marital trust for his wife, Julia Hall, taking advantage of the federal marital estate-tax deduction. The trust paid Julia the income for life and gave her a testamentary power of appointment over the corpus. Arthur’s will specifically gave Julia a general power of appointment “by specific reference to the powers granted herein, in her will,” to direct distribution to her estate or any other party. If Julia failed to exercise the power of appointment, then the corpus would go to a residual trust under Arthur’s will. Arthur’s will appointed United Virginia Bank (plaintiff) executor of Arthur’s estate and trustee of Julia’s marital trust. Julia’s will gave her sister, Hazel Holzbach (defendant), “all of my estate, be it real, personal, or mixed, or in which I may have a power of appointment of whatsoever, nature, kind or description, and wheresoever the same may be located.” The bank petitioned the court to decide whether Julia’s will effectively exercised her power of appointment, naming Holzbach as a party in interest. The person who wrote Julia’s will submitted an affidavit stating that Julia knew she had a power of appointment under Arthur’s will and discussed it with the drafter when her will was prepared. The judge nonetheless found that Julia’s will did not exercise her power of appointment and ordered the corpus of the marital trust distributed as part of Arthur’s residuary estate. Holzbach appealed, arguing Julia intended to and did appoint the corpus to Holzbach.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Poff, J.)

Dissent (Harrison and Cochran, JJ.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,200 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership