Home Indemnity Co. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.

474 F.2d 1081 (1973)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Home Indemnity Co. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
474 F.2d 1081 (1973)

Facts

Parker G.M.C. Truck Sales, Inc. (Parker) (defendant) sold a new truck to Bodge Lines, Inc. (Bodge). As part of the deal, Bodge agreed to trade in a used truck. A lender held the certificate of title for Bodge’s used truck, but the parties agreed Parker would pay the balance due to the lender to get the title. Parker delivered the new truck to Bodge, and Parker then sent an employee to pick up the used truck from Bodge. The used truck wasn’t available until later that day, but Parker’s representative could not come back that day. One of Bodge’s mechanics volunteered to drive it over to Parker, and Parker’s employee agreed. On his way over, the mechanic crashed the used truck and injured two people. Parker had the truck towed to Parker’s lot. Parker paid off the used truck, repaired it, and resold it. Later, the two people injured in the truck accident sued for personal injury. In a separate lawsuit, Home Indemnity Co. (Home Indemnity) (plaintiff), Bodge’s insurance company, sued Twin City Fire Insurance Co. (Twin City) (defendant), Parker’s insurance company. Home Indemnity wanted the court to declare that Parker was the owner of the truck at the time of the accident, and, therefore, that Parker was liable for any personal injuries caused by the accident. The trial court determined that Parker owned the truck when the mechanic crashed it. Twin City and Parker appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hastings, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership