Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los Angeles

227 U.S. 278 (1913)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los Angeles

United States Supreme Court
227 U.S. 278 (1913)

Play video

Facts

Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. (HT&T) (plaintiff) was a California corporation that provided telephone services in the city of Los Angeles (defendant). HT&T sued the city and city officials to enjoin enforcement of a city ordinance establishing telephone rates that HT&T alleged were unreasonably low and in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. HT&T filed the complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, which dismissed the complaint for lack of federal court jurisdiction. The district court reasoned that a suit alleging that violation of the United States Constitution also implicitly alleged a violation of the state constitution. If a state official violates the state constitution, then that act cannot be said to be a state action in violation of the United States Constitution. The district court reasoned, therefore, that federal courts did not have jurisdiction until after final disposition of the case by the state court. HT&T took a direct appeal to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership