Honeyville Grain, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

444 F.3d 1269 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Honeyville Grain, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
444 F.3d 1269 (2006)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

The National Labor Relations Board (the board) held an election for the employees of Honeyville Grain, Inc. (Honeyville) (plaintiff), and 23 out of 32 workers voted in favor of a drivers’ union (the union) (defendant). Honeyville challenged the election based on comments made at a union meeting five days before the election. At the meeting, two union agents discussed that Honeyville’s owners were Mormon and that, because of that fact and tax benefits to the company, Honeyville donated substantial amounts of money to the Mormon Church and its missionaries. The union agents believed that more of Honeyville’s earnings should be shared with the company’s workers instead of Mormon missionaries, who traveled the world. The religious references were only ever made at the one meeting out of a total of about 10 union meetings. There was no evidence regarding the bargaining unit’s religious makeup. The board overruled Honeyville’s objections to the religious comments and certified the union. The Tenth Circuit reviewed the matter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Henry, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership