From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. Kilgore
Arizona Court of Appeals
2015 WL 1044587 (2015)
Honeywell International, Inc. (Honeywell) (plaintiff) extended credit to American Alarm Company, Inc. (defendant), and American Alarm Company failed to pay. Honeywell sued, among others, American Alarm Company and Jared Kilgore (defendant), an Arizona resident, who Honeywell claimed had signed a personal guarantee of American Alarm Company’s debt. The personal guarantee had a forum-selection clause selecting New York State courts. The guarantee also had a place for an account to be listed, but this line remained blank. Honeywell attempted to serve Kilgore in Arizona several times, ultimately obtaining service using New York’s nail-and-mail method, which permitted a party to obtain service by sending the process via United States mail to the party’s last known address if several unsuccessful attempts at service had already been made. Honeywell obtained a default judgment in New York, and then Honeywell attempted to enforce the judgment in Arizona. Kilgore moved to vacate the judgment, arguing that the New York judgment was not valid because New York did not have personal jurisdiction over him. Kilgore argued that the forum-selection clause in the guarantee was not valid because someone had forged his signature on the guarantee. Further, Kilgore argued that there were two American Alarm companies, American Alarm Company as well as American Alarm Partners of Arizona, Inc., which was not a party to the New York case. Kilgore claimed he had never worked for American Alarm Company, and Honeywell had no evidence to establish that the personal guarantee had been made on behalf of American Alarm Company. The trial court granted Kilgore’s motion, and Honeywell appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Orozco, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.