From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Hood v. Knappton Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
986 F.2d 329 (1993)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
A boat owned by Knappton Corporation, Inc. (defendant) was tugging a raft down a channel in Oregon. The tug moored the raft on some pilings near the shore, and lines were tied to both ends of the raft. The line tying one end of the raft came loose, and the raft drifted into the channel, hitting some fishing boats. The owners of the fishing boats (plaintiffs) sued Knappton in negligence. The district court determined that, as the owner of a vessel that had become unmoored, Knappton bore the burden of showing that it had not been negligent. The district found Knappton to be 75 percent responsible for the accident and awarded damages accordingly. Knappton appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
