Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hood v. Ryobi America Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
181 F.3d 608 (4th. 1999)


Hood (plaintiff) purchased and used a saw manufactured by Ryobi America Corp. (Ryobi) (defendant). Despite at least seven clear, simple warnings not to do so in the manufacturer’s manual, Hood removed the blade guards from the saw and used it for home carpentry. The warnings stated that using the blade guards was necessary to avoid “severe injury” and “possible serious personal injury.” Hood lost part of his thumb and lacerated his leg due to an accident caused by using the saw without blade guards. The saw blade detached from the saw and struck Hood. He brought suit against Ryobi alleging the company failed to comply with its duty to warn because the warnings about using blade guards did not explain the consequences potentially resulting from failure to use the guards. He stated that he was unaware of dangers from the saw blade detaching from the saw, but that Ryobi was aware of this danger because it had previously occurred to other users. Additionally, Hood alleged Ryobi was negligent and the saw was defective. The trial court granted summary judgment for Ryobi, and Hood appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.