Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hoover v. Smith

Supreme Court of Virginia
444 S.E.2d 546 (1994)


Facts

In 1928, one acre of land was conveyed to Add Shoemaker and Bessie Shoemaker. The deed stated the land was conveyed to Add and Bessie “as joint tenants, and not as tenants in common.” Add died in 1952, survived by Bessie and several children. After Add’s death, Bessie conveyed a half-acre portion of the property to their son Wilmer Shoemaker. Bessie died in 1984. Wilmer died in 1988. In his will, Wilmer devised the half-acre portion of property to Shelby Moubray. Moubray then conveyed the property to David Smith and Vivian Smith. In 1992, several of Add and Bessie’s children (the Hoovers) (plaintiffs), filed suit against the Smiths and several other of Add and Bessie’s children (defendants). The Hoovers alleged that under Virginia statute, Add and Bessie were tenants in common and each had obtained a one-half interest in the real estate. The Hoovers argued this meant that Add’s one-half interest should have passed to his surviving children at his death. The Hoovers asked for sale of the property and division of the proceeds in accordance with that finding. The defendants responded that the deed established joint tenancy with the right of survivorship. The defendants also argued this meant Add’s one-half interest passed to Bessie at his death. Thus, everything should remain as it was. The trial court found for the defendants and dismissed the case. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Carrco, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.