Hopson v. Texaco, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
383 U.S. 262, 86 S. Ct. 765, 15 L. Ed. 2d 740 (1966)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Two seamen (plaintiffs) employed by Texaco, Inc. (defendant) fell ill while working on a vessel docked in Trinidad. Federal law required Texaco to transport the incapacitated seamen to the United States Consul so that arrangements could be made to return the men to the United States. The consul’s office was 38 miles away. The master of the vessel, following Texaco’s normal procedures, hired a taxi to take the men to the consul’s office. The taxi driver drove negligently, causing an accident in which one seaman was killed and the other injured. The injured seaman and representatives of the killed seaman (plaintiffs) sued Texaco under the Jones Act. At the district-court trial, the jury awarded damages. The court of appeals reversed, holding that Texaco could not be held liable for the negligence of the taxi driver. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.