Horizon Mills Corp. v. QVC, Inc.

161 F.Supp. 2d 208 (2001)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Horizon Mills Corp. v. QVC, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
161 F.Supp. 2d 208 (2001)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD

Facts

Horizon Mills Corp. (Horizon) (plaintiff) developed and marketed a fabric made from acetate and spandex called SLINKY. Horizon registered the SLINKY trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. QVC, Inc. (QVC) (defendant) retailed goods through its cable network and online retailing services. QVC used “slinky” to describe both acetate-spandex blend fabric and women’s apparel made from this type of fabric. Media, the women’s apparel trade, and consumers began to use the term “slinky” to describe stretchy, flowing fabrics that hug the body and are made of acetate, spandex, and other man-made materials. Horizon sued QVC for trademark infringement. QVC moved for summary judgment. QVC argued that Horizon’s SLINKY mark was generic and, therefore, ineligible for trademark protection. In support of its motion, QVC submitted over 60 media uses of the term “slinky.”

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schwartz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership